[104257] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Blackham)
Sat May 3 15:23:20 2008
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:23:15 -0600
From: "Kevin Blackham" <blackham@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Lewinski" <mike@rockynet.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <481CA08D.5090200@rockynet.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We did that with our internally anycasted recursors at my former
network. A script withdraws the routes if bind isn't answering. Works
great.
On 5/3/08, Mike Lewinski <mike@rockynet.com> wrote:
> David Coulson wrote:
> > Depends - It doesn't help if the DNS server is dead, but the front-end
> > is still advertising the routes.
>
> Possibly a good argument for allowing the DNS servers to originate the
> routes for them...? I've seen configuration where the routes were
> injected based on link state via crossover cable, so at least if the
> whole machine pukes the route is dropped. But if the resolver or OS
> itself is just hung then yeah...
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG@nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
