[104193] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Manthey)
Tue Apr 29 17:48:12 2008

From: Marc Manthey <marc@let.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <202705b0804290931h2c4912c3t5bd3c00b407ee88d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:48:00 +0200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Am 29.04.2008 um 18:31 schrieb Jorge Amodio:
> besides the multicast argument,

hi  Jorge , all

ok, i was talking about a "campus" installation

imagine  you want to broadcast a live event  so
10.000 unicast streams and 10.000 multicast stream for example.

from what toni replyed , you need less horsepower with the multicast  =

streams

> For 10000 concurrent unicast streams you'd need not just more servers.


but would like to know how this  could be calculated.

my 00.2 ;)

marc

-
Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment
Marc Manthey -  Hildeboldplatz 1a
D - 50672 K=F6ln - Germany
Tel.:0049-221-3558032
Mobil:0049-1577-3329231
jabber :marc@kgraff.net
blog : http://www.let.de
ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org

Klarmachen zum =C4ndern!
http://www.piratenpartei-koeln.de


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post