[104191] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Purpose of Internap's PNET AS22212
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Palmer)
Tue Apr 29 16:25:52 2008
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:25:40 -0400
From: "Brandon Palmer" <bpalmer@fxcm.com>
To: "Thurber" <ct@datagram.com>,<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <C43B6D0F.3298%ct@datagram.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
They have a bunch of transit providers they use, PNET is yet another path that they can use. They have enough traffic that goes PNAP <--> PNAP that I presume it would be cheaper to use their own dark fiber or something than to keep paying the other transit providers.
>>> Thurber <ct@datagram.com> 4/28/2008 12:01 PM >>>
Can anybody shed some light on Internap's PNET AS22212? Specifaly how it
relates to their PNAP architecture? Is Internap now doing peering? I was
under the impression that their entire business model was based around
isolated PNAPs and being a backboneless provider. Attempts at getting an
explanation from Internap have been fruitless.
CT
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
