[104028] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephane Bortzmeyer)
Tue Apr 22 09:54:20 2008
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:54:16 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: michael.dillon@bt.com
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B002629D0D@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:02:21PM +0100,
michael.dillon@bt.com <michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote
a message of 46 lines which said:
> This is where all the algorithmic tinkering of the P2P software
> cannot solve the problem. You need a way to insert non-technical
> information about the network into the decision-making process.
It's strange that noone in this thread mentioned P4P yet. Isn't there
someone involved in P4P at Nanog?
http://www.dcia.info/activities/p4pwg/
IMHO, the biggest issue with P4P is the one mentioned by Alexander
Harrowell. After that users have been s.....d up so many times by some
ISPs, will they trust this service?
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
