[1040] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing wars pending?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Little)
Wed Nov 15 16:45:16 1995
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
cc: HANK@taunivm.tau.ac.il, nanog@dune.silkroad.com,
big-internet@munnari.oz.au, cidrd@iepg.org, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Nov 1995 14:40:03 EST."
<9511151940.AA10864@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 16:33:40 -0500
From: Mike Little <little@faline.bellcore.com>
In regards to:
>(Tim Bass)
> Technically, the aggregation advocates were correct. Socially and
> politically, aggregation on a global cooperative scale has problems.
>(Noel)
>Which is why we need *two* namespaces: one for the routing to do what
>mathematics forces it to, and one for the humans to be able to dork with.
This idea has been around *long* enough. When do we separate the name
spaces? How about along with the IPng transition?
-Mike
