[103848] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Calling TeliaSonera - time to implement prefix filtering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Tue Apr 15 13:20:42 2008
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:10:52 -0400
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: "Fred Reimer" <freimer@ctiusa.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <98B7739FB65BF04F9B3233AB842EEC95024A45AC@EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Yes, it is operational.
Best,
Marty
On 4/15/08, Fred Reimer <freimer@ctiusa.com> wrote:
> But isn't this what nanog is for? It appears to be more on-topic than the
> email threads. More E than S.
>
> Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
> Senior Network Engineer
> Coleman Technologies, Inc.
> 954-298-1697
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > michael.dillon@bt.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:51 AM
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: RE: Calling TeliaSonera - time to implement prefix filtering
> >
> >
> >
> > > >> aut-num: AS29049
> > > >> and *of course* they don't own 62.0.0.0/8.
> > > >
> > > > Own!?
> > >
> > > I think he was saying that Delta Telecom don't *own*
> > > 62.0.0.0/8 and therefore shouldn't be advertising it.
> > > Following that Telia shouldn't be accepting the route and
> > > then re-announcing it to peers ...
> >
> > Of course! ... /8? ... Azerbaijan? ... What was I thinking?...
> >
> > Still, it would be better to contact the upstream directly
> > and work back through the peering chain because this kind
> > of thing is usually a result of education deficit, not malice.
> >
> > --Michael Dillon
>
