[103825] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Abuse response [Was: RE: Yahoo Mail Update]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mark seiden-via mac)
Tue Apr 15 05:50:56 2008
Cc: ops.lists@gmail.com, nanog@merit.edu
From: mark seiden-via mac <mis@seiden.com>
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawg@netzero.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080414.224702.289.4@webmail24.vgs.untd.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:41:00 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
do you remember the days when some of us would only take routing table
updates
from andrew partan, because we trusted him?
that's what it's like now wrt takedowns.
do not minimize the use of malicious takedowns by twits and bad guys,
who fabricate a report
of misfeasance to get their enemies taken down.
On Apr 15, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you send reports with lots of legal boilerplate, or reports with
>> long lectures on why you expect an INSTANT TAKEDOWN, and send them to
>> a busy abuse queue, there is no way - and zero reason - for the ISP
>> people to prioritize your complaint above all the other complaints
>> coming in.
>
> Having elided the rest of this exchange, and also understanding
> exactly what you are talking about, I encourage you to elaborate
> on the point you are trying to make...
>
> As you well know, there are many of us who have been working on
> this particular issue for years, with wildly varying degrees of
> success.
>
> There is no pat answer...
>
> - - ferg
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
>
> wj8DBQFIBEFTq1pz9mNUZTMRArvBAJ0XvKGXrL5yCKttE/0g1cxpkuWwAwCcCnw8
> 7Y8Q1TPWRnpvVH/5fdh5r2c=
> =Gcoo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
> Engineering Architecture for the Internet
> fergdawg(at)netzero.net
> ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
>
>
