|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:57:46 +0530 From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com> To: "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> Cc: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <CDC3F11F-D53D-4506-B3C8-4DC9CD7CD72E@delong.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote: > Now I'm lost again. You've mixed so many different metaphors from > interdomain routing to distance-vector computaton to store-and-forward > that I simply don't understand what you are proposing or how one > could begin to approach implementing it or what problem you seem > to think it solves (although it sort of seems like you're wanting to attack > the trustworthiness of email to battle SPAM through some mechanism > that depends only on the level of trust for the (source, arrival path) > tuple from whence it came. Looks like what various people in the industry call a "reputation system"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |