[103540] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Does TCP Need an Overhaul?" (internetevolution, via slashdot)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Moyle-Croft)
Sat Apr 5 07:45:01 2008

Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 22:13:57 +1030
From: Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc@internode.com.au>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
CC: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <47F75842.6070008@internode.com.au>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Reworded:

What I'm not quite sure "Fast Flow" is exactly what is it really doing 
that isn't being done already by the DPI vendors (eg. Cisco SCE2000 on 
the Cisco webpage claims to be able to track 2million unidirectional 
flows).
>
> Am I missing something? 
Aside from my horribly broken attempt at English?

:-)

MMC
> MMC
>
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> ...
>>
>> i wouldn't want to get in an argument with somebody who was smart and 
>> savvy
>> enough to invent packet switching during the year i entered 
>> kindergarden,
>> but, somebody told me once that keeping information on every flow was 
>> *not*
>> "inexpensive."  should somebody tell dr. roberts?
>>
>> (i'd hate to think that everybody would have to buy roberts' (anagran's)
>> Fast Flow Technology at every node of their network to make this 
>> work.  that
>> doesn't sound "inexpensive" to me.
>>   
>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post