[103531] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Does TCP Need an Overhaul?" (internetevolution, via slashdot)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Sat Apr 5 01:43:16 2008

From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:39:46 GMT
To: morrowc.lists@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

>I suppose he could try to sell it... and people with larger networks
>could see if keeping state on a few million active flows per device is
>'expensive' or 'inexpensive'. Perhaps it's less expensive than it
>seems as though it would.


I like & respect Larry, etc., but actually, he is trying to
"sell it" in a semi-disingenuous way:

http://www.anagran.com/company_management.php

See also:

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/080607-roberts-fast-flow-routing.h=
tml

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFH9xCaq1pz9mNUZTMRAmSBAJ9FTHV/mWnZXcNR6drkqktdn+3DJACg6gaX
8/TN08qfaXCJrEhwhw0/ybw=3D
=3DMr08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post