[103504] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Apr 3 21:41:25 2008
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
To: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:40:19 +0800
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <fsu0o0$nk$1@ger.gmane.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--nextPart2858229.aFLYkAbVRG
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, David Freedman wrote:
> We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well
> for us.
An inevitable end as the number of routes grows.
That said, RFC 4684 would appear to be the ultimate=20
solution, although vendor support is not rife at the=20
moment.
Cheers,
Mark.
--nextPart2858229.aFLYkAbVRG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)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=3HN4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2858229.aFLYkAbVRG--
