[103287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rack power question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Tue Mar 25 09:19:55 2008
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:08:05 +0000
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: "Leigh Porter" <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>, michael.dillon@bt.com,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <47E8F1A9.6040202@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_18951_23998067.1206450485326
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
A valve in the connector; has to be pushed in by the other connector to let
the water flow. Water pressure pushes it shut otherwise so it fails-safe.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
wrote:
>
> That would be pretty good. But seeing some of the disastrous cabling
> situations it'd have to be made pretty idiot proof.
>
> Nice double sealed idiot proof piping with self-sealing ends..
>
> --
> Leigh
>
>
> --
> Leigh
>
> Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> > I still think the industry needs to standardise water cooling to
> popularise
> > it; if there were two water ports on all the pizzaboxes next to the
> RJ45s,
> > and a standard set of flexible pipes, how many people would start using
> it?
> > There's probably a medical, automotive or aerospace standard out there.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Leigh Porter <
> leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> $5
> >>
> >>
> >> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>
> >>> This thread begs a question - how much do you think it'd be worth to
> do
> >>> things more efficiently?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Adrian
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
------=_Part_18951_23998067.1206450485326
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
A valve in the connector; has to be pushed in by the other connector to let the water flow. Water pressure pushes it shut otherwise so it fails-safe.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Leigh Porter <<a href="mailto:leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com">leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
That would be pretty good. But seeing some of the disastrous cabling<br>
situations it'd have to be made pretty idiot proof.<br>
<br>
Nice double sealed idiot proof piping with self-sealing ends..<br>
<br>
--<br>
Leigh<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Leigh<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
Alexander Harrowell wrote:<br>
> I still think the industry needs to standardise water cooling to popularise<br>
> it; if there were two water ports on all the pizzaboxes next to the RJ45s,<br>
> and a standard set of flexible pipes, how many people would start using it?<br>
> There's probably a medical, automotive or aerospace standard out there.<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Leigh Porter <<a href="mailto:leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com">leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
>> $5<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Adrian Chadd wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> This thread begs a question - how much do you think it'd be worth to do<br>
>>> things more efficiently?<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Adrian<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_18951_23998067.1206450485326--
