[103190] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Mar 21 17:26:34 2008
To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:44:39 EDT."
<2d106eb50803211344s11ae7b19n38b1007263e32e0c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:18:06 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1206134286_3599P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:44:39 EDT, Martin Hannigan said:
> <personal opinion>
>
> I dont think that there's any issue at all to be honest. NANOG isn't
> just for the clued.
>
> </personal opinion>
And more to the point - if somebody manages to go through all the hoops needed
to ask a basic question on the NANOG list, it demonstrates a desire to
accumulate clue - so we should encourage those people. I'll make the
prediction that in 5 years, the person who *started* this thread will be
substantially more clued than the lead network engineer at many AS's (you all
know the ones I mean - that AS that's 1 or 2 hops away from you that on a
weekly basis do something that makes you want to go and inject clue with a
baseball bat..)
--==_Exmh_1206134286_3599P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFH5CYOcC3lWbTT17ARAvc8AKDMHXfuk7FiRS5gBhEAF9lZeVPJzwCg6IJC
BYAWJPU/K4f/my9n0YwJIAw=
=OPkf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1206134286_3599P--
