[10294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Catherine Anne Foulston)
Fri Jun 27 17:25:55 1997
From: Catherine Anne Foulston <cathyf@is.rice.edu>
To: jack.rickard@boardwatch.com (Jack Rickard)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 16:16:26 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199706271835.2051600@boardwatch.com> from "Jack Rickard" at Jun 27, 97 12:38:02 pm
Jack Rickard writes:
> webcentric. From an end users perspective, what does a web site on a
> specific network look like and how does that compare to a web site on
> another network?
Ok, so that's what you have (possibly -- there are many variables)
measured. So if I want to have a web site hosted on a shared web
server, then this measurement might possibly be useful to me.
But if I am looking for someone to sell my company a T1 connection,
and I want to do my own web hosting, then this information would be
nearly useless. There are many factors which would affect the
performance of a provider's web site but which would have no effect
whatsoever on the performance of a T1 connection from the provider.
For example:
- the hardware the web server runs on
- the software and its configuration on the web server
- the load on the web server
- the characteristics of the LAN to which the web
server is connected
The report says "Keynote decided to measure a backbone provider's own
public web server on the assumption that the provider would locate its
own server in the best-performing hosting location for that provider."
Do all the providers listed even provide web-hosting as a service?
All this makes the title "Internet Backbone Index" very misleading.
If you had called it "Internet Web Service Index" that would be a
much better description of what you have measured.
Catherine Foulston cathyf@rice.edu Rice University Network Management
p.s. I don't work for any of the listed providers.
