[102787] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Deaggregation factor jump (Re: Weekly Routing Table Report)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Payne)
Tue Feb 26 19:41:03 2008
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802241026220.28151@pegasus.billn.net>
Cc: Justin Shore <justin@justinshore.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:20:51 -0500
To: Bill Nash <billn@billn.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--Apple-Mail-63-278669051
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
delsp=yes;
format=flowed
On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Bill Nash wrote:
> The bgp mib doesn't contain an object to tell you, summarized, how
> many prefixes a peer is sending
No, but the BGP4+ MIB does... different vendors implemented that MIB
early with differing OIDs :(
Support for the correct OID is, er, sadly lacking in common versions
of popular routing OSen.
--Apple-Mail-63-278669051
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=US-ASCII
<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<br><div><div>On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Bill Nash wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">The bgp mib doesn't contain an object to tell you, summarized, how many prefixes a peer is sending</font></p> </blockquote></div><br><div>No, but the BGP4+ MIB does... different vendors implemented that MIB early with differing OIDs :(</div><div>Support for the correct OID is, er, sadly lacking in common versions of popular routing OSen.</div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail-63-278669051--
