[102776] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [admin] [summary] RE: YouTube IP Hijacking

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron Glenn)
Tue Feb 26 15:30:07 2008

Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:09:56 -0800
From: "Aaron Glenn" <aaron.glenn@gmail.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20080226182123.GA14827@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


for a list filled with network operators and engineers, the lot of you
are quick to whip out lawyers and courts and international tribunals.
perhaps I missed the message, but has anyone mentioned the direct
economic impact of SFI? as a responsible network operator, would you
peer with a network that didn't filter their customers and was
consistently linked to route leakage issues? when is enough, enough
(in general, not speaking to any specific network)?

also, this:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>         The biggest problem here is that Cisco needs to change
>  their defaults to require more configuration than
>
>  router bgp X
>   neighbor 1.2.3.4 remote-as A
>
>  When that's the bar for the complexity required for setting up BGP,
>  bad things WILL happen.  Period.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post