[102723] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: YouTube IP Hijacking
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Greene (bgreene))
Mon Feb 25 10:02:33 2008
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:49:35 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20080225053148.326ba730@cs.columbia.edu>
From: "Barry Greene (bgreene)" <bgreene@cisco.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Steven M. Bellovin
> How about state-of-the-art routing security?
>=20
> Seriously -- a number of us have been warning that this could happen.
> More precisely, we've been warning that this could happen=20
> *again*; we all know about many older incidents, from the=20
> barely noticed to the very noisy. (AS 7007, anyone?) =20
> Something like S-BGP will stop this cold.
>=20
> Yes, I know there are serious deployment and operational=20
> issues. The question is this: when is the pain from routing=20
> incidents great enough that we're forced to act? It would=20
> have been nice to have done something before this, since now=20
> all the world's script kiddies have seen what can be done.
BCPs stops this problem. soBGP may make it easier.=20
