[102700] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: YouTube IP Hijacking

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Mon Feb 25 02:59:24 2008

Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:27:41 +0200
To: "Randy Epstein" <repstein@chello.at>,
        "'Tomas L. Byrnes'" <tomb@byrneit.net>,
        "'Simon Lockhart'" <simon@slimey.org>
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Cc: "'Michael Smith'" <msmith@internap.com>, <neil.fenemor@fx.net.nz>,
        <will@harg.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <064f01c87743$853953a0$2801a8c0@D88CFA77634F40F>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


At 07:15 PM 24-02-08 -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:

>More importantly, why is PCCW not prefix filtering their downstreams?

Why?

- Lack of clue
- Couldn't care less
- No revenue

Take your pick - or add your own reason.  PCCW is not alone.  They just 
happen to be the latest in a long line of ISPs that follow the same rules - 
their own.

-Hank



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post