|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:08:20 -0500 From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com> To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> CC: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Nanog <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <1235FB56-9994-4638-8ADA-C9006F63536A@delong.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu Owen DeLong wrote: > This would create significant legal challenges and costs. I dont understand how they could prevail. Suppose I decided to tell people that as far as I was concerned this 32 bit number up to that 32bit number would be available for their use in whatever manner they wanted, like printing them on t-shirts, and that they would have the privilege of paying me for the guarantee that I would do so uniquely. Barring a prior agreement, what grounds does any third party have to object? For that matter, aside from consensus and inertia, what would stop the operator community as a whole from setting up shop with a "forked" registry that had no contractual agreements with anybody prior?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |