[102195] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Greene (bgreene))
Thu Jan 31 23:03:27 2008
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:02:24 -0800
In-Reply-To: <47A26190.40701@dsminc-corp.com>
From: "Barry Greene (bgreene)" <bgreene@cisco.com>
To: "Silas Moeckel" <silas@dsminc-corp.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
=20
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Check out:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html
I still think the CIDR Report only has a impact if you have a team of
volunteers knocking people on the side of the head and getting them
to pay attention. People look at the top, but try looking at the
bottom 2/3. =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Silas Moeckel
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements
>=20
>=20
> I have the misfortune of attempting to make the argument to=20
> one of the top 20 worst offenders on the CIDR report=20
> aggregation summary. If anybody has some good PHB fodder and=20
> info on general bad things that can happen by doing things=20
> this way please email me off list. I'll summarize what I get=20
> in a few days. There is no major TE or similar reason for=20
> them to be on there just bad practices since the last time I=20
> restructured there network. Obviously since things work=20
> today they are hesitant to change.
>=20
> Silas Moeckel
> DSM Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBR6KZ0L/UEA/xivvmEQLtCwCaAy2F8rp5IbfbfWzY3kDABJ6ejfEAn0Ff
pcaKf5KH8FDFjtkQ6l3ABiI4
=3DREYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
