[101583] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Sun Jan 13 01:20:22 2008
From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:08:17 GMT
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
So, someone else (Thanks, by the way -- this is the one I was looking
for) pointed me to RFC3013/BCP46:
http://rfc-editor.org/cgi-bin/rfcdoctype.pl?loc=3DRFC&letsgo=3D3013&type=
=3Dhttp&f
ile_format=3Dtxt
In addition to RFC2142, it would appear that these are largely
ignored just as much as any other operational IETF documents.
That's a shame.
$.02,
- - ferg
p.s. Thanks to everyone for their replies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
wj8DBQFHiarRq1pz9mNUZTMRAkF1AKDMzsJlzSLPPVkR2GMrUXN/CDFBXgCguQy4
C9PMJ0Jl9a9XJjEZ9aqLIUY=3D
=3DG7gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
