[101517] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 connectivity mandates?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jan 9 01:11:46 2008
To: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:58:27 EST."
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0801071451250.359@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:09:09 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1199858948_3703P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:58:27 EST, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
> Has anyone seen any indication that, given the US government's push to
> deploy IPv6, they will start (or perhaps they've started already?) writing
> mandates for applicant networks to have IPv6 connectivity into the
> requirements for federally funded grants?
I haven't seen any. But we've been doing IPv6 for so long that it wouldn't
make a notice in our network group - people would just check it off as "BTDT",
perhaps after calling our helpdesk and asking "Do we have it" and being told
"Yes".
--==_Exmh_1199858948_3703P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFHhGUEcC3lWbTT17ARAlPmAKCMaVVXSI6ORjtLg3JkesnA6hGyCQCffYfH
MZF8Vs69rMIwUAlxSXJqy4U=
=oRPc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1199858948_3703P--
