[101515] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Tue Jan 8 21:38:14 2008
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:06:07 +0530
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: "yangyang. wang" <wyystar@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <10fbbf5a0801081825n65cc69bdsb8a4e34a7b7cbb@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
You could try this recent nanog thread for some ideas
Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg02822.html
srs
On Jan 9, 2008 7:55 AM, yangyang. wang <wyystar@gmail.com> wrote:
> As we known, the DFZ RIB size expand rapidly. It may be resolved via router
> architecture improvement, such as adding memory chips or compressing RIB. or
> via changing routing and addressing scheme, which one will be the long-term
> essential approach?
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
