[101477] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Jan 7 13:37:35 2008
To: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@aitken.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:34:22 EST."
<20080107123422.GA62054@eagle.aitken.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:32:23 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1199730743_2703P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:34:22 EST, Jeff Aitken said:
>
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:42:50AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > I believe Steve Bellovin has already written extensively on this, and some
> > of the more plausible alternate non-scanning strategies for worm propagatio
n.
> > I'm sure Steve has a pointer to the paper in question, which I've managed
> > to misplace in my senility... ;)
>
> Perhaps this one?
>
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/v6worms.pdf
Yes, that's the one...
--==_Exmh_1199730743_2703P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFHgnA3cC3lWbTT17ARAu9eAKDOQPst1wPVHJbc+6ygsEQkg6I9jwCfQous
0ZiBWsqe2H5sz+AYG8WsNzM=
=qxI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1199730743_2703P--
