[101451] in North American Network Operators' Group
[admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <>
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Fri Jan 4 13:42:07 2008
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:33:05 -0500
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: nanog-admin <nanog-admin@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <a2b2d0480801041002o724260f3w2a722136e5b9371a@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Folks,
Let's bring this one to closure. The authors question is answered and
this is backing itself into an endless thread with arguments better
suited for the IETF vs. NANOG.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG Mailing List Committee
On Jan 4, 2008 1:02 PM, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't
> > have an email problem at all.
> >
> > A
> >
>
> Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide
> interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict
> validation...
>
>
