[101358] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Jan 2 02:05:52 2008
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:02:19 -0500
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <75cb24520801012135j7dc4d3f7n3e16a64e8ccc8e78@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Jan 2, 2008 12:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 12:46 PM, James Hess <mysidia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The place where major problems could be run into is deciding how big a
> > block your ISPs and
> > LIRs get, or if the registries are entertaining the concept of PI
> > space for v6.. how large
>
> too late NRO policy comparison chart:
>
> http://www.nro.net/documents/nro45.html#3-4-3
>
someone pointed out that the APNIC policy doc at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/ipv6-address-policy.html
doesn't reflect the end-user PI assignment policy wording that appears
to be in the NRO link, perhaps someone from APNIC could clarify the
current state of affairs for us?
They also pointed out that I missed Afrinic in my listing... NRO
thinks that afrinic also does /48 end-user assignments... fyi.
> Specifically APNIC and ARIN have /48 end-user assignments (PI)
> policies in place, RIPE is still discussing this policy as of the last
> meeting (if I recall correctly).
>
