[101347] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Mon Dec 31 19:06:13 2007
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:33:57 +1030
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Cc: jnanog@gmail.com (Rick Astley), nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200712311618.lBVGI8f1080718@aurora.sol.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:18:08 -0600 (CST)
Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> wrote:
>
> > I see there is a long thread on IPv6 address assignment going, and I
> > apologize that I did not read all of it, but I still have some unanswered
> > questions.
>
<snip>
> Anyways, I suggest you run over and read
>
> http://www.6net.org/publications/standards/draft-vandevelde-v6ops-nap-01.txt
>
That ended up, after a number of revisions, being published as RFC4864
- "Local Network Protection for IPv6".
> as it is useful foundation material to explain IPv6 strategies and how they
> differ from IPv4.
>
> ... JG
> --
> Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
> "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
> won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
> With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
--
"Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
alert."
- Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"
