[101245] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Greco)
Mon Dec 24 08:10:11 2007

From: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
To: joelja@bogus.com (Joel Jaeggli)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:08:05 -0600 (CST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <476F4D33.10309@bogus.com> from "Joel Jaeggli" at Dec 23, 2007 10:09:55 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


> It's likely that the device may choose to nat when they cannot obtain a
> prefix... pd might be desirable but if you can't then the alternative is
> easy.

I thought we were all trying to discourage NAT in IPv6.  Clearly, NAT
solves the problem ... while introducing 1000 new ones.  :-/

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post