[101219] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /56 for home sites, /48 for business sites & billing considerations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Sun Dec 23 14:39:15 2007
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:34:46 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
CC: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <493E25F5-9CC6-475E-8535-91DD4E1F140B@icann.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig6A5987FBD70DBDA62E3ADB9A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2007, at 21:31, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>=20
> [...]
>=20
>> When an ISP is not going to provide /48's to endusers then RIPE NCC
>> should revoke the IPv6 prefix they received as they are not following
>> the reasons why they received the prefix for.
>=20
> They received the prefix because they had a plan. That's all, a plan.
> Not a promise.
It is not a plan, it is justification. The 200-rule has been taken out
of the allocation already.
And based on the x customers times /48, they justified that they will
need a /20 or something else. As such when they are going to give out
/56's, they suddenly need 256 times as many customers and unless they
are going to grow insanely (for a /32 from ~60k to 15m customers) they
won't be able to justify their address space anymore.
As such, keep it simple folks, just pass out /48's.
Greets,
Jeroen
--------------enig6A5987FBD70DBDA62E3ADB9A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHbrhWKaooUjM+fCMRAiAiAJ4yJLncqRK0KuakZV9LXXQDQ+D6GwCfQGSq
HdRXReUnRe1Vlz8CTlxpKKM=
=jf+P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig6A5987FBD70DBDA62E3ADB9A--
