[1011] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AS690 advisory update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Elliot Alby)
Tue Nov 14 14:45:49 1995
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:35:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Elliot Alby <ealby@sprint.net>
To: Steve Heimlich <heimlich@ans.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, ealby@sprint.net, kconners@sprint.net, insc@sprint.net,
db-wg@ripe.net, engineer@sprint.net
In-Reply-To: <199511131629.AA18351@interlock.ans.net>
> After this time, AS690 advisories will be ignored. Policy toward
> routes registered in the IRR will be based solely on origin AS.
> The origin AS will be expanded to the set of route objects registered
> for that origin AS; the resulting list of prefixes will be used in
> generating router configurations, as today.
in the case of AS#1 routing AS#2, suppose AS#2 sent in the route object
and list themselves as the origin, and put AS#1 in the advisory. in the
new scenario, will ANS now only allow routes coming via the ASN in the
ORIGIN field? i.e. will AS#2 have to change the ANS in the origin field
to AS#1 so ANS knows where to look for for the routes?
- elliot alby/sprintlink implementation
