[100817] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Nov 13 12:37:50 2007
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:35:22 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAAC7q0MpdFr/ToiABwzZzDynAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* frnkblk@iname.com (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]:
>If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel
>planning beyond adding more "channel blankets".
I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing. Seems to
work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so
clients.
* carl@personnelware.com (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]:
>On Wifi for 1000:
[..]
In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the
last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working
wireless - even with thousands of attendees:
http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1347-Camp07-NetworkReview.pdf
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1247-23c3-noc-review-corrected.pdf
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/fahrplan/attachments/652-slides_network_review.pdf
(They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this
year's edition, by the way)
Regards,
-- Niels.
--
"The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse, with
four of the buttons on the keyboard."
-- Peter da Silva <peter@taronga.com>
