[100646] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: monitoring tools

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Regnauld)
Tue Oct 30 17:14:05 2007

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:11:25 +0100
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA3D3D74C7@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Nesser, Phil (nesser) writes:
> 
> It has been a while since I have had to seriously think about network/system/application monitoring and now I have got to look at it.  Can anyone point me towards:
> 
> 1.  Serious documents on monitoring (i.e.  not vendor whitepapers)

	Hi Phil,

	There's lots of different papers out there -- define serious.
	Is an online column comparing monitoring systems serious enough ?
	What focus ?  Best practices ?  Agent vs SNMP based, etc...  Topics
	are varied.

> 2.  Open Source Tools that you use or would recommend (I know the obvious smokeping, mrtg, nagios).

	That can be a long thread as well...
	Nagios, OpenNMS, Zabbix, Hyperic, ZenOSS - for the application/
	service/server/network monitoring, and Cacti, Smokeping, NFsen
	for capacity/availability monitoring.

	We used Nagios and co. until a few years ago, when we figured it
	wouldn't scale for large networks.  Then we wrote our own :)

	Cheers,
	Phil

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post