[100640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Senie)
Tue Oct 30 12:25:23 2007
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:21:44 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <7d6a0cac0710300907j60e94361l8515a18f4f182d57@mail.gmail.co
m>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 12:07 PM 10/30/2007, Al Iverson wrote:
>On 10/30/07, chuck goolsbee <chucklist@forest.net> wrote:
>
> > On a more relevant and operational sort of note, it sure would be
> > nice if there were a NAMOG (North American Mail Operators Group) or
> > the like to resolve these sorts of issues. Feel free to clue-by-four
> > me if I've missed it.
>
>MAAWG come pretty close: http://www.maawg.org/home
Smaller/regional ISPs need not apply. Minimum cost of entry is
$3,000/year, no voting rights ($12.5K if you actually care about
voting). So if you're not Verizon or Comcast or similarly sized, it
appears you're not really welcome.
Though it might make sense to discuss some other things NANOG could
do in addition to worrying about routing table size and churn in the
core, those are all discussions for the Futures list.
