[100217] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Owen)
Fri Oct 19 16:43:19 2007
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:00:43 -0400
From: "Mark Owen" <mr.markowen@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Lewinski" <mike@rockynet.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4719059A.9030407@rockynet.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_7620_31890574.1192824043255
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/19/07, Mike Lewinski <mike@rockynet.com> wrote:
>
> With the remaining 1% being Linux ISOs.
>
> I wonder what happens to these network police appliances (Sandvine,
> Packeteer etc) when the P2Ps implement encryption and tunnel it all over
> 443/tcp?
They'll just monitor for streams that utilize large portions of bandwidth
for extended amounts of time and throttle all.
--
Mark Owen
------=_Part_7620_31890574.1192824043255
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mike Lewinski</b> <<a href="mailto:mike@rockynet.com">mike@rockynet.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
With the remaining 1% being Linux ISOs.<br><br>I wonder what happens to these network police appliances (Sandvine,<br>Packeteer etc) when the P2Ps implement encryption and tunnel it all over<br>443/tcp?</blockquote><div><br>
They'll just monitor for streams that utilize large portions of bandwidth for extended amounts of time and throttle all. <br></div><br></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mark Owen
------=_Part_7620_31890574.1192824043255--
