[100181] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 240/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pekka Savola)
Fri Oct 19 01:28:31 2007
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:27:05 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <00ef01c81209$abf7d290$dae9020a@atlanta.polycom.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>
>> The operators who want to do something private with this space don't need
>> the IETF or IANA approval to do so. So they should just go
>> ahead and do it. If they can manage to get it to work, and live to tell
>> about it, maybe we can consider that sufficient proof that we can start
>> thinking about reclassification.
>
> There are, fortunately, a number of vendors that don't like to go against
> existing RFCs.
So.. can you clarify. Which RFCs require routers or hosts to reject
240/4?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
