[100109] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 240/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (michael.dillon@bt.com)
Wed Oct 17 17:42:01 2007
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:42:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <C33A5A39.3D37%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
From: <michael.dillon@bt.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> I'm trying to avoid setting the expectation that 240/4 is=20
> just a simple extension to 10/8 and thus people should use it=20
> *today* when they run out of space in RFC1918.
I don't believe you.
If you were really trying to "avoid setting the expectation" then you
would be communicating with the authors of
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuller-240space-00.txt to see
that the IETF gets their wording right.
This is IETF work and IANA work at this point, not NANOG work.
--Michael Dillon
