[888] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: Marilee Jones (Dean of Admissions) on the New Improved MIT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (kate.)
Thu Oct 4 14:49:54 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <20011003133336.A18308@necromancer.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:33:36 -0400
Reply-To: "Documentation at http://web.mit.edu/beland/talk/talk.html"
<MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU>, "kate." <raven@NECROMANCER.MIT.EDU>
From: "kate." <raven@NECROMANCER.MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <20011002110413.B23471@innocuous.mit.edu>; from tibbetts@MIT.EDU
on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:04:14AM -0400
> * They have no problem with authority.
not as such, no. until "authority" starts being dicks and talking about me like this.
The majority of my audiences this
> age seem to carry upwards from eight ECAs in high school, in
> addition to a stiff course load. (I wonder when these teens
> actually sleep.)
we have naptime after Milk break, mommy. then we play on the jungle gym.
That aside, though, does it occure to her that the REASON lots of MIT (and
everywhere else, nowadays) students are president of the debate team and
on fifty three committees? because you provide positive feedback loops for
resume turds, who pad their college applications with no thought to the
activity they are chairman of.
> They desire
> structure when we are all about choice. They don't consider "choice"
> to be a value as the Boomers and Gen Xers do.
um...yeah. right. which is why we complain so much when our fucking housing
choices were slashed? or when our choices for dining are ruined? no, i dont
value choice. eat me.
i could say more, but i am a bit upset. sorry. this is just my opinion.
kate.
