[642] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Dartmouth and Zeta Psi

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sourav K. Mandal)
Sat May 12 21:09:41 2001

Message-Id: <200105130109.VAA06972@dichotomy.dyn.dhs.org>
From: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
Reply-To: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
To: mit-talk@mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 21:09:03 -0400


""Prez H. Cannady" <revprez@MIT.EDU>" wrote:

> [...] What's next?  Crackdown on any party
> that plays hip hop because it "degrades women," "promotes
> racial stereotypes," and "advocates criminal behavior?"

The real problem here is that the ZP newsletter provided the names of 
real people.  While there are certainly no _legal_ grounds for tort 
action, it violates the implicit expectation of privacy that one has 
when living in a college campus.  In a residental university, this 
expectation is vital towards creating an enviroment conducive to 
education.  The administration of the university, as stewards of an 
_intellectual_ community, has an obligation to discipline those who 
would interfere with its bottom line -- learning.

Playing "hip hop" is tolerable, since it does not directly harm the 
university's mission by directly harming its members.

Aram Harrow posted links to the original documents, suggesting that the 
Zeta Psi newsletter is a _personal_ communication, and that the same 
expectation of privacy I discuss above can be applied to the 
newsletter.  However, Zeta Psi is an official house in Dartmouth's 
official housing system, and this was their newsletter; the fact that 
it was internal does not relieve Zeta Psi of the obligation to follow 
Dartmouth's policies.  After Zeta Psi is disbanded this spring, members 
who have a strong desire to make tasteless conversation should do it 
from the comfort of their dorm rooms or apartments on _private_ mailing 
lists.

Peter Shulman raises the idea of an official MIT code of conduct.  
Based on the right principles, this can be a good thing; based on the 
wrong principles, this can magnify the scourge of political correctness 
to heretofore unseen heights.


Cheers,

Sourav


------------------------------------------------------------
Sourav K. Mandal

Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com
http://www.ikaran.com/Sourav.Mandal/






home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post