[476] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: In Defense of Affirmative Action

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (matt)
Thu May 3 01:22:53 2001

To: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
Cc: mit-talk@mit.edu
From: matt <deberg@xennahtron.com>
Date: 03 May 2001 01:21:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: "Sourav K. Mandal"'s message of "Wed, 02 May 2001 22:49:21 -0400"
Message-ID: <knhr8y7dn2p.fsf@chamomile.xennahtron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

    Sourav> Well stated!  To see this, one must be willing to apply the
    Sourav> logic behind affirmative action/equal opportunity programs
    Sourav> to "bad" things as well, such as to justify racial
    Sourav> profiling.  If racial profiling, the trend analysis of crime
    Sourav> by racial/ethnic group, is stupid, why is it okay to extract
    Sourav> information about "disadvantage" by racial/ethnic group?
    Sourav> It's not consistent to have criminal justice work by one
    Sourav> principle of judging people, and university admissions by
    Sourav> the opposite.

well, ok, but you're not comparing the two on a level playing field.

remember, AA was put in place to rectify past injustices to an entire
segment of our population.  the premise is that the world would be a
better place if all races were on equal footing, and that getting there
requires active government support, including but not limited to AA.

you'd have to make the same sort of argument to justify racial
profiling.  i've never heard anyone do that.

if your opposition to AA is simply that it is inconsistent w/ other
possible programs that we don't have, well, that's not very compelling.

    Sourav> The individual is everything.  Ideally, MIT should have
    Sourav> need-blind, race-blind, nationality-blind, gender-blind
    Sourav> admissions; the admissions committee should have a random
    Sourav> drawing when it can't decide among a group of candidates, to
    Sourav> prevent the entry of any bias.

i agree, given an ideal world where opportunity is equal.  we're not
there yet.

i think i'm done here.  feel free to take the last word.

matt

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post