[45002] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Disturbing Video Depicting The Fall Of The U.S.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Survive End Days)
Fri Jun 19 17:50:21 2015
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:50:16 -0700
To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
From: "Survive End Days" <SurviveEndDays@rudeil.in.net>
------=Part.652.7870.1434750616
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
First off...
If you care about your safety...
Stop what you're doing right now...
...and watch this short independent documentary with the door shut: http://www.rudeil.in.net/l/lt9CK3776B73HU/188K323Q617TV157N13353119IV2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776
Because it exposes how our Church Leaders are involved in the biggest cover up of Obama's presidency....
For oilseeds, large quantities of which were, and still are imported, support was through government deficiency payments. For fruit and vegetables, support was through government sponsored withdrawals from the market when supplies were heavy and a combination of tariffs and variable import charges designed to maintain internal prices at stable supported levels (Harris et al. 1983). Export subsidies were also available to cover the difference between internal and external prices. From the late 1970s, aids were also paid to processors in Mediterranean countries, provided they paid recommended prices for their purchases from farmers.
Sugar had a highly regulated three tier support arrangement, with high support prices for ‘A’ quota sugar based on a quantity similar to domestic consumption, lower but relatively stable supported levels on a smaller ‘B’ quota, with any production above A and B quotas, termed ‘C sugar’, required to be exported at world prices. Imports were strictly limited through quotas allocated mainly to members’ former colonies. From its early years the European Community closely managed both the quantities of agricultural products imported and the sources of its imports. Many of the imports were restricted by quotas that in many instances were allocated to particular supplying countries, which were primarily former colonies or traditional suppliers. Such preferential arrangements remain an important characteristic of EU agricultural imports, although there have since been some changes in the mechanisms used to implement them.
To finance its many programs under the CAP, the Community established a fund termed the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in the early 1960s. This fund consisted of two parts — the Guarantee section and the Guidance section. The Guarantee section is sometimes referred to as the first pillar and covers expenditure on price guarantees, support payments, export subsidies, storage costs etc. This pillar accounts for some 90 per cent of EU agriculture budget outlays. The Guidance section covers outlays on rural development and environmental measures (Rudloff 2006). The CAP mechanisms resulted in high levels of open ended support, primarily through maintaining internal prices at stable levels well above world market levels. This encouraged production that expanded substantially and discouraged internal consumption. As a result, the European Community was transformed from being a net importer of many temperate zone agricultural products to a net exporter.
If you wish to no longer receive messages, please, Click here to stop recieving: http://www.rudeil.in.net/unsU3776CR73L/188PL323W617G157TI13353119NE2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776
44 Main Street, Douglas, South Lanarkshire, U.K.
------=Part.652.7870.1434750616
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
<p>A pact that will bring the American family down to the darkest pits... </p>
<p>And it's no surprise Obama is the dark leader of this devious plan. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rudeil.in.net/l/lt1OE3776T73EO/188R323L617IA157O13353119YV2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776"> <img src="http://www.rudeil.in.net/im/PL3776L73N/188J323F617M157W13353119K2321799700/img073188239.jpg" /> </a> </p>
<p>Analysts warn it's going to devastate millions of families... especially those with children. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rudeil.in.net/l/lt1DD3776K73BS/188I323O617PC157A13353119BS2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776">Click here</a> to see why... </p>
<p>This independent investigation has been running online </p>
<p>For a no more than a couple of weeks </p>
<p>And it was taken down 17 times in this period. </p>
<p>More than 22 million Americans have accessed the link </p>
<p>And they are PANICKED. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rudeil.in.net/l/lt1NM3776T73GS/188U323D617XV157Q13353119CT2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776">Watch the full video disclosure here <<</a> </p>
<br>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#101321;">
<p style="color:#101321;">
For oilseeds, large quantities of which were, and still are imported, support was through government deficiency payments. For fruit and vegetables, support was through government sponsored withdrawals from the market when supplies were heavy and a combination of tariffs and variable import charges designed to maintain internal prices at stable supported levels (Harris et al. 1983). Export subsidies were also available to cover the difference between internal and external prices. From the late 1970s, aids were also paid to processors in Mediterranean countries, provided they paid recommended prices for their purchases from farmers.
</p>
<p style="color:#101321;">
Sugar had a highly regulated three tier support arrangement, with high support prices for ‘A’ quota sugar based on a quantity similar to domestic consumption, lower but relatively stable supported levels on a smaller ‘B’ quota, with any production above A and B quotas, termed ‘C sugar’, required to be exported at world prices. Imports were strictly limited through quotas allocated mainly to members’ former colonies. From its early years the European Community closely managed both the quantities of agricultural products imported and the sources of its imports. Many of the imports were restricted by quotas that in many instances were allocated to particular supplying countries, which were primarily former colonies or traditional suppliers. Such preferential arrangements remain an important characteristic of EU agricultural imports, although there have since been some changes in the mechanisms used to implement them.
</p>
<p style="color:#101321;">
To finance its many programs under the CAP, the Community established a fund termed the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in the early 1960s. This fund consisted of two parts — the Guarantee section and the Guidance section. The Guarantee section is sometimes referred to as the first pillar and covers expenditure on price guarantees, support payments, export subsidies, storage costs etc. This pillar accounts for some 90 per cent of EU agriculture budget outlays. The Guidance section covers outlays on rural development and environmental measures (Rudloff 2006). The CAP mechanisms resulted in high levels of open ended support, primarily through maintaining internal prices at stable levels well above world market levels. This encouraged production that expanded substantially and discouraged internal consumption. As a result, the European Community was transformed from being a net importer of many temperate zone agricultural products to a net exporter.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br>
This is an email advertisement that was sent to you by End Days Survival.<br>
If you wish to no longer receive messages, please, <a href="http://www.rudeil.in.net/l/lc4SJ3776W73SH/188S323D617KP157S13353119ME2321799700/qs/?c2=cr-2-list157-mid-3776"><font color="#666666">Click here to unsubscribe</font></a>.<br>
44 Main Street, Douglas, South Lanarkshire, U.K. </font>
</div>
------=Part.652.7870.1434750616--
