[434] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

women@mit

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Susan M Buchman)
Tue May 1 16:22:50 2001

Message-Id: <200105012020.QAA19974@m2-032-12.mit.edu>
To: mit-talk@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:20:45 -0400
From: Susan M Buchman <susan1@MIT.EDU>


>> Other obligatory MIT content:  Ladies on this list how did you feel 
>> about the women@mit feature that the illustrious TECH did on Friday?

i think the tech did a fine job in general, but i was a little
perplexed about who they asked to speak about *women's* issues. most
disturbing was having mit pro-life attend their round table. i guess i
fail to see how a group whose goal is to control women's lives and
whose officer list is **87%** male - that's right, baby, 87% - is
qualified to speak about women's issues just because they can dredge
up a woman to represent them.

might as well invite the extropians while you're at it... (and it all
comes full circle.)


susan

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post