[40022] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Intensify Your Sex Drive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vydox)
Fri Apr 17 06:04:30 2015
To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
From: "Vydox" <Vydox@fatlossknows.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:04:30 -0700
Reply-To: <bounce-2581589@fatlossknows.com>
------=Part.163.6499.1429265070
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Intensify Your Sex Drive
http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/tindex7.html
Update Preferences- http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/rindex8.html
------=Part.163.6499.1429265070
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
<html>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/tindex1.html"><H3>Intensify Your Sex Drive</a></H3></strong>
<td colspan='2' align='center' valign='middle' class='preview-mid'><br><center><a href="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/tindex2.html"><img src="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/i/img05531151227.jpg" border=0 alt=""></a></center> <div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br><a href="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/rindex3.html"><font color="#666666">Update Preferences</font></a><br><br> 23638 W. Lyons Avenue #468 - Newhall, CA 91321</font></td></td></tr></table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>
<br />
<a href="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/mit-talk-mtg/u.html" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.fatlossknows.com/2381-553-1151-2581589/i/img15531151227.png"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<font style="color: #FCFCFC">r to make a stronger argument for his case.So theres no question
that Obama sincerely believes governments should endorse the practice of same-sex marriage
and theres also no question that the president was in an untenable
position on his same-sex stance prior to Bidens expression of comfort surrounding
the equivalence of gay marriage.But as for why the president would do
it in such as awkward way a midday interview with the
host of ABCs morning show Obama blamed the vice president, suggesting
that Biden, a man often mocked for his blurting and blunders, had
simply done it again. The presidents suggestion is that he had a
more elegant and politically effective plan for letting voters in on his
choice.Democrats argue that the presidents support of same-sex marriage is a positive
since it shows him, a president often seen as weak, as a
bold leader. It also allows Democrats to further attack Romney as a
cruel extremist for an audience of suburbanites who seem
d not nailed down the timing of that announcement. The officials acknowledged
that Biden's comments sped up the timetable dramatically, and that the vice
president's remarks were not part of an orchestrated roll-out of the president's
position -- in other words, the president was not planning to address
the issue this week.Obama's decision was met with immediate praise by gay
advocacy groups."President Obama's 'evolution' is now complete. Congratulations, Mr. President, for making
history today by becoming the first sitting president to explicitly support marriage
for same-sex couples," said Rea Carey, director of the National Gay and
Lesbian Task Force.Yet the endorsement entails political risk, particularly among independents who
were vital to Obama's 2008 victory and even socially conservative black Democrats.
While the list of states that allow gay marriage is growing, a
total of 30 states have constitutional amendments or laws barring those partnerships
or
isconsin in charge," Walker said to his supporters.Labor is spending big money
in this race -- $7 million came from labor, according to the
latest financial disclosures. The Democratic Governor's Association is also weighing in though
they are sly about it. They contribute money to the Greater Wisconsin
Political Fund, which produces some of the most negative ads of this
campaign.However, Republican governors are weighing in through a PAC called Right Direction.As
broadcast outlets profit and Wisconsin viewers are bombarded with partisan messages, even
the chair of the State Democratic Party Mike Tate admits the party
has lost control of the message. He was recorded telling volunteers, "It's
not the party that pays for the ads. It's the candidate's money
and a lot of the money is from third party groups that
we can't talk to at all."Mordecai Lee, professor of government affairs at
the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, says that is the new reality in politics.
</p>
</html>
------=Part.163.6499.1429265070--
