[37777] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Out With The Old Windows- in With the New ..Local Contractor quotes Free
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Window Savings)
Mon Mar 23 10:24:07 2015
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:24:06 -0700
To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
From: "Window Savings" <WindowSavings@zuwmcvqdvq.eu>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 681px; background-color: #cc9900;}
#tap{margin: 10px 0; font: 11px Comic Sans;}
#subj{font: 24px sans-serif; color: #00ffff ; margin: auto auto 12px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#cc9900; padding-top: 11px;}
#imag1{max-width: 681px; background-color: #cc9900; padding: 11px; border: 7px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
Can't look at our news-letter as pictures are blank? <a href="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/l/lt1XJ9188A127R/132QU545U47497L305UO116285397AU3520839174"> simply hit this to reload'em.</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/l/lt1TE9188L127Y/132PR545E47497I305QJ116285397TL3520839174" id="subj"> Out With The Old Windows- in With the New ..Local Contractor quotes Free </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/l/lt1IW9188R127M/132OB545H47497P305LK116285397HE3520839174"><img src="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/im/HC9188PC127TQ/132YN545W47497M305O116285397N3520839174/img012713288.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/l/lc4FV9188V127X/132FR545J47497N305OB116285397AG3520839174"><img src="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/im/DK9188VQ127WD/132WE545I47497M305J116285397E3520839174/img112713288.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>
<table style="width: 681px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 15px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="center">
equal to it? And why should it not? But in that case where would be the surplus value?25 If then surplus value be actually bound up with the physical productivity FITDVLQ
of capital, the fact DHOB is certainly not self-evident; and a theory which, without a word OGLD of explanation, takes that as self-evident has not done what </p>
<BR /><BR /><span style="font-family: sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial;"></span>
<p>we WOFDRP expect YKMFHTPW of a theory. [none] To 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee sum up. Whichever of the two meanings we 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee give to the expression "productive power," the Naïve Productivity theory breaks down. If it
hierts DVC a direct value-creating power in capital, it hierts what is impossible. There is no power in any element of production to infuse value
immediately or necessarily into its products. A NPFLDX factor of production 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee can never be an adequate source of value. Wherever value makes its 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee appearance
it has 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee its ultimate cause in the relations of human needs 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee and satisfactions. Any tenable explanation of interest must go back to this ultimate source. But the hypothesis of value-creating power is an attempt </p>
<BR /><BR /><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 7px;"></span>
<p align="center">to evade this last and most difficult part of the OKMSA explanation by a quite untenable hiumption. If, however, the writers we are discussing understand by productivity,
merely physical productivity, then they are mistaken in treating surplus value as an accompanying phenomenon that requires no UGFSUKXP explanation. In
hiuming that it is self-explanatory, 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee and contributing no proof to the hiumption, their theory leaves out the most important and difficult part </p>
<BR /><BR /><span style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px;"></span>
<p>of the explanation. It is, however, very easy to understand the strong adherence given to the Naïve Productivity theory in spite of these defects. It is impossible to 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee
deny that at the first glance there is something exceedingly plausible about it. It is undeniable that capital helps to produce, and helps to DAA
produce "more." At the same time we know that, at the RHKLWH end of every production in which capital takes part, there remains over a "surplus" to
the undertaker, and that the amount of this surplus bears a regular 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee<U>proportion to the</U>amount of capital expended, and to the duration 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee of its
expenditure. In these circumstances nothing really is more natural than to connect the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee existence QUJFMRQ of this surplus with the productive power that </p>
<BR />
<p align="center" style="font: 13px;">resides in capital. It would have QPIDFB been wonderful indeed if the Productivity theory had not been put forward. DCJKWEXV How long one remains under the influence of TBX this theory depends on 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee how soon
one begins to reflect critically on the meaning of the word "productive." So long as one does not reflect, the theory appears to be an exact WUF
representation of facts. It is a theory 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee which, one 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee might say with Leroy-Beaulieu, "N'a fait ici que copier la nature." But when one does
reflect, this same theory<B>shows itself to be a web of dialectical sophistry, woven by the misuse of that ambiguous term, "Productive Surplus 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee</B></p>
<BR /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span>
<p align="right" style="font: 11px;">Result" of capital. That is<I>why the Naïve Productivity theory is, I might say, the</I>predestinated interest 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee theory of a primitive and half-matured condition of
the science. But it is also predestinated to disappear so soon as the science ceases to be "naïve." That up till the present day it is so widely HHEOX .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/unsY9188A127FL/132RW545EK47497HI305R116285397I3520839174"><img src="http://www.zuwmcvqdvq.eu/im/NT9188TY127TX/132WR545U47497A305P116285397R3520839174/img212713288.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>
