[37710] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Video reveals, The real Wealth- That lies hidden in your beliefs.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vitale Secrets)
Sun Mar 22 11:15:08 2015

Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:15:07 -0400
From: "Vitale Secrets" <VitaleSecrets@carrangine.eu>
To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">


<html>


<head>


<style type="text/css">


#tab{width: 652px; background-color: #ccccff;}


#tap{margin: 13px 0; font: 9px Trebuchet MS;}


#subj{font: 23px  Comic Sans; color: #ffffff ; margin: auto auto 18px auto;}


#imag{background-color:#ccccff; padding-top: 16px;}


#imag1{max-width: 652px; background-color: #ccccff; padding: 13px; border: 4px double red;}


#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}


</style>


</head>


<body>


<center>


<table id="tab">


<tr>


<td align="center">


<p id="tap">


Cannot read our A.D because of pictures being off? <a href="http://www.carrangine.eu/l/lt1I9163E198IE/203UL1013U47145QG305OH116285397V1108475628"> Make sure to press this to reload'em.</a>


<br>


<br>


<br>


</p>


</td>


</tr>


<tr>


<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">


<a target="" href="http://www.carrangine.eu/l/lt1A9163X198CM/203HW1013A47145PD305LE116285397E1108475628" id="subj"> Video reveals, The real Wealth-  That lies hidden in your beliefs. </a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center" id="imag" >


<a href="http://www.carrangine.eu/l/lt1C9163P198YU/203MQ1013G47145WV305RB116285397S1108475628"><img src="http://www.carrangine.eu/im/D9163VJ198LM/203S1013H47145N305TL116285397CB1108475628/img019820388.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center">


<a href="http://www.carrangine.eu/l/lc4Q9163O198PW/203UT1013T47145PY305NX116285397W1108475628"><img src="http://www.carrangine.eu/im/J9163PA198EU/203W1013P47145H305JI116285397QY1108475628/img119820388.jpg"/></a>


</td>


</tr>


<table style="width: 652px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 14px;">


<tr>


<td>


<span id="content">


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<p align="center" style="font: 12px;">Productivity theory 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee has managed to hold its own. Indeed, at the present time the majority 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee of CDEFM 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee such writers as GXBYUY are not entirely opposed to interest, </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 10px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p align="center">acquiesce in one or other modification of this theory.<i>[none] The idea that capital produces its own interest, whether true</i>or false, seems at least to 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee be clear and simple. It might be expected, therefore, 
that the theories built on this fundamental idea SHSKJGJI would be marked by a peculiar definiteness and transparency in their arguments. In this 
expectation, however, we should be completely disappointed. Unhappily the most important conceptions connected with the Productivity theories suffer  RYI 
in an<b>unusual degree from indistinctness and ambiguity; and this has been the abundant source</b>of obscurity, mistakes, confusion, and fallacious  VUF 
conclusions of every kind. These occur so frequently<U>that it would be unwise to</U>let the reader meet them without some preparation. Once embarked  LCRWSS 
on a sea of individual statements, it would be impossible to find our reckoning. It seems then necessary to mark out distinctly, in a few  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span>
<p align="left">introductory remarks, the ground we mean to cover in stating and criticising these BVWHKG theories. Two things here seem to stand particularly in need of clear statement. 
First, the meaning, or, more properly, the complex of meanings of the expression Productivity or Productive Power of 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee capital; and second, the </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 7px;"></span>
<p align="center" style="font: 9px;">
nature of the FOFBNXK theoretic task hiigned by these theories to this productivity. First, What is meant by saying, Capital is IJVRSEJT productive? 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee In its 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee most common and weakest sense the expression may be taken to NIOUVS mean no 
more than this,—that capital serves towards the production<I>of goods, in opposition OSMIUKHE to the immediate satisfaction of needs. The predicate</I>
"productive," then, would only be applied to capital in the same sense as, in the usual clhiification of goods, we speak of "productive goods," in  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
opposition to "goods for immediate consumption" (Genussgüter). Indeed the smallest degree of productive effect would warrant the conferring of CTA that 
predicate, even if the product should MFVEA not attain to the value of the capital expended in making it. It is clear from 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the first that a productive </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 7px;"></span>
<p align="left" style="font: 9px;">power 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee in this sense cannot possibly be the BQTQY sufficient cause of interest. The adherents of those theories, then, LLWEDQSLN must ascribe a stronger meaning to 
the term. Expressly or tacitly 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee they understand it as meaning that, by the aid of capital, more is produced; that capital is the cause of a particular </p>
<BR>
<p align="right" style="font: 14px;">productive surplus result. But this meaning also is subdivided. The words "to produce more" or "a productive surplus result" may mean one of two things. They may either mean  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
that capital produces more goods or more value, and these are in no way identical. To keep the two as distinct in name as they are in fact, I shall  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
designate the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee capacity of capital to produce more goods as its "Physical Productivity"; its capacity to produce more value as its "Value 
Productivity." It is perhaps not unnecessary to say that, at the present stage, ESRE I leave it quite an open question whether capital actually possesses 
such capacities or not. I only mention the different meanings which may be given, and have been given, to the proposition "capital is productive."  JDQEQU .</p>





<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


</span>


</td>


</tr>


</table>


<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>


</table>


</center>


<center><a href="http://www.carrangine.eu/unsHF9163FP198GE/203UD1013V47145J305GD116285397X1108475628"><img src="http://www.carrangine.eu/im/H9163UA198QS/203H1013X47145E305BW116285397BU1108475628/img219820388.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>


</html>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post