[36339] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Expand your business, with a Cloud
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cloud Solution Platforms)
Tue Mar 3 11:13:16 2015
To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 08:13:14 -0800
From: "Cloud Solution Platforms" <CloudSolutionPlatforms@ppoie.eu>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 693px; background-color: #663300;}
#tap{margin: 19px 0; font: 11px Trebuchet MS;}
#subj{font: 23px Trebuchet MS; color: #99ffff ; margin: auto auto 13px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#663300; padding-top: 17px;}
#imag1{max-width: 693px; background-color: #663300; padding: 14px; border: 6px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
Can't see this A-d at all? <a href="http://www.ppoie.eu/l/lt1W8782SY200MJ/205VM1022K36832N354P116285397K3624001643"> Please visit this to reload'em.</a>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.ppoie.eu/l/lt1H8782SR200SV/205KH1022G36832I354Q116285397B3624001643" id="subj"> Expand your business, with a Cloud </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.ppoie.eu/l/lt1Q8782PH200PD/205WJ1022U36832T354G116285397Q3624001643"><img src="http://www.ppoie.eu/im/SU8782AO200IK/205E1022X36832W354LT116285397QE3624001643/img020020588.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.ppoie.eu/l/lc4R8782BM200AL/205FC1022F36832U354J116285397U3624001643"><img src="http://www.ppoie.eu/im/BJ8782EV200DM/205M1022X36832I354MO116285397SY3624001643/img120020588.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
<table style="width: 693px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 9px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="left">and interest have been higher in the United States than in England, 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee in the Pacific than in the Atlantic States. Is it not a notorious fact that where
labor flows for higher wages, capital also flows for higher interest? Is it not true that wherever there has been a general rise or fall in wages there 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee
has been at the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee same time a similar rise or fall in interest? In California, for instance, when wages were higher than anywhere else in the
world, so also 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee was interest higher. Wages and interest have in California gone<B>down together. When common wages were 65 a day, the ordinary 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee bank rate</B>
of interest 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee was twenty-four per cent. per annum. Now that common wages are 62 or 62.50 a day, the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee ordinary bank rate is from ten to twelve per cent. </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 7px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p>Now, this SQY broad, general fact, that wages are higher<i>in new countries, where capital is relatively scarce, than in old countries, where</i>capital is
relatively abundant, is too glaring to be ignored. And<U>GMPNETCF although very lightly touched upon, it</U>is noticed by the expounders of the current
political economy. The manner in which it is FHJKESFFE noticed proves what I say, that it is utterly inconsistent with the accepted theory of wages. For in
explaining it such writers<b>as Mill, Fawcett, and Price virtually give up the theory 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee</b>of wages upon 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee which, in the same treatises, they formally
insist. Though 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee LEJY they declare<u>that wages are fixed by the ratio between capital and</u>laborers, they explain the higher wages and interest of new
countries by the greater relative production of 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee wealth. I shall hereafter show that this QHHGVA is HQSGX 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee not the fact, but that, on the contrary, the production
of wealth is relatively larger in old and densely populated countries than in new and sparsely populated countries. But at present I merely wish to GYLMUPRA
point out the inconsistency. For to say that the higher wages of new countries 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee are due to 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee greater proportionate production, is clearly to make </p>
<BR>
<p align="right" style="font: 14px;">the ratio with production, and not the ratio with capital, the determinator of wages. though this inconsistency does not seem to have been perceived by the clhi WBNDW
of writers to whom I refer, it has been noticed by one of the most logical of the expounders of the current political economy. Professor 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee
Cairnes* endeavors in a very ingenious way to reconcile the fact with the theory, by hiuming that in new countries, where industry is generally UJDHPNGG
directed to the production 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee of food and what in manufactures is called 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee raw material, a much larger proportion of the capital used in production is
devoted to the hi of wages than in older countries where a greater part must be expended in machinery and material, and thus, 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee in the new
country, though capital is WPOVPY scarcer, and interest is higher, the amount determined to the hi of wages is really larger, MIHK and wages are also
higher. For instance, of 6100,000 devoted<I>in an old country to manufactures,</I>680,000 would probably be expended for buildings, machinery 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee
and the purchase of materials, leaving but 620,000 to be paid out in wages; whereas in a new country, of 630,000 devoted to agriculture, etc., not more 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee
than 65,000 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee would be required for tools, etc., leaving 625,000 to be distributed in wages. In this way it is explained that the wage QIX fund may EDNXG be .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.ppoie.eu/unsM8782CT200Q/205Y1022Q36832C354CA116285397RR3624001643"><img src="http://www.ppoie.eu/im/GA8782PX200RL/205N1022S36832X354YA116285397LR3624001643/img220020588.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>
