[2697] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robotica)
Wed Oct 18 10:02:21 2006
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:01:33 -0400
From: Robotica <androidqueen@gmail.com>
To: "Steven M Kelch" <kelch@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610180054340.23767@ptolomaea.mit.edu>
Cc: mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
On 10/18/06, Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> wrote:
> "A resolution that completely removed the studio from control of the Logs
> would not pass. I don't understand your objection to asking them to honor
> their agreement from 4 years ago."
steven:
perhaps i am reading the wrong bill, but as i read it it says:
"Whereas, the other a cappella groups on campus support the Logs in
building a recording studio and have agreed to cede control of some
office space to allow the Logs to build the studio provided that they
will eventually be able to uses the studio;"
nowhere in there does it say that said groups would be able to use it
for free (or, for that matter, *when* they would be able to use it).
what am i missing?
-m
--
ninjaneer. geomancer. licensed scientician.
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
