[2673] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (oldja@mit.edu)
Tue Oct 17 18:26:28 2006
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:26:04 -0400
From: oldja@mit.edu
To: Kelsey Byers <kbyers@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610171800010.19321@white-meteo.mit.edu>
Cc: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>, Adam Seering <aseering@mit.edu>,
Clayton Sims <ctsims@mit.edu>, Alexander J Werbos <awerbos@mit.edu>,
mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
Just a quick clarification... ASA groups make no distinction as being
"for grad
students" or "for undergrads". However, groups must make a funding choice- if
they have more undergrads, they are funded by UA Finboard. If they have more
grads, they are funded by GSC Funding. No group gets both. Just one. If they
have about equal numbers, they get to choose whether they like UA or GSC
better. ASA has final approval on this.
So, the UA may make policy regarding "undergrad groups" (those funded by
Finboard). It would be up to the GSC whether they'd like to follow our policy
lead. Or they may wish to discuss this with UA if a discrepancy in policy
proves to be problematic.
> 2. How does UA/UA Finboard plan to deal with the GSC and GSC's
> Funding process?
We don't.
-Lauren
UA Treasurer
ASA Executive
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
