[1256] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: CREIGHTON/BRAR decision
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phife)
Sat Mar 16 13:59:03 2002
Message-ID: <200203161849.NAA10740@babayaga.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 13:49:48 -0500
From: Phife <aca3@MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:24:55 EST."
<200203161524.KAA02231@department-of-alchemy.mit.edu>
One more joke.
Over the past few days, on this and other lists, several members of
the UA past and present have objected to their portrayal by a very
large number of students as a bunch of disconnected career ass-kissers
who do nothing to improve the experience of their constituents at MIT.
So they make an assinine decision replete with blatant doouble
standards to disqualify a ticket that clearly has the strong support
of a very large portion of the voting students, who they claim to
represent.
Um, in case you haven't noticed, you've just solidified the UA's
image as a pack of bullshitters who seek to embellish their
resumes with no concern for, if not at the expense of MIT
undergraduates, for the next 3 years, at least.
Long live the Legacy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
