[1119] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: wow
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phife)
Wed Mar 13 14:30:38 2002
Message-ID: <200203131928.OAA11825@nerd-xing.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:28:23 -0500
From: Phife <aca3@MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:19:30 EST."
<1016047170.3c8fa642a316b@webmail.mit.edu>
Eyo, knz@MIT.EDU broke it down like this:
>
>Once again, I'm impressed. This time by your noble and courageous actions such
>
>as donating money to Rhett's cause in order to "overthrow the system" when I a
>m
>willing to bet equally as much as you have donated so thoughtfully that you
>have never actually done anything to improve the system yourself.
You seem to be missing the point, sugar bum. If people think Rhett
will do a good job as President, whatever their definition of good,
then they are doing something to improve the system by voting for him
and supporting his campaign. That's how representative government
works, get it? Or will you not be satisfied until we all run at once?
>Have you considered donating that money to charity yourself, by the way? Or is
>
>it only for such tremendous causes as this that you so graciously give away
>money?
Since you don't like the dictionary, I'll put it in my own
words. Since you don't know many, if not most of the people on this
list, it is plain cubeless stupidity to assume that any or all of
them don't give 6,234.7 times more to charity than you do. Some may,
some might not. You have no clue, so why is the sarcasm warranted, baby?
->Honeybun
P.S.
soph.o.mor.ic \.sa:f-*-'mo-r-ik, -'mo.r-, -'ma:r-\ aj 1: of, relating to,
or characteristic of a sophomore 2: conceited and overconfident of
knowledge but poorly informed and immature
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
