[3378] in Depressing_Thoughts
give me chocolate now, and no one gets hurt
ckclark@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ckclark@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Tue Oct 13 23:38:22 1992
(Although this transaction has the same title as [0042] in yum, it is
not a cross-posting.)
I am on my second (and hopefully, last) large dark chocolate frappe from
Tosci's, and am waiting for suggestions on how I can get more (not
quantity-wise, but intesity-wise.)
First of all, I should make it clear that I am not a chocoholic; I can
stop any time I want. I am not even a "social" chocolate user (I don't
hang out in chocolate bars munching on chocolate bars after happy hour.)
And you won't catch me waking up in the middle of the night in a cold
sweat craving for a Hershey's bar, nor will you read in the paper that
I've been knocking over liquor stores or mugging people to "support my
habit," because I don't have a habit. However, there are times in my
life when I feel the only possible remedy for my ailments is the
immediate and unrestricted consumption of an otherwise inordinate amount
of chocolate. Besides---you can trust me on this---it's a lot safer
some of the alternatives.
Why this sudden need?
Because I'm waiting. I'm waiting for something, or, more precisely, one
or more of a number of things.
I don't have to wait. I could take any of a number of actions which
might determine an outcome, although I confess I am not in a good
position to guess which actions correspond to which possible outcomes;
I'm not even convinced that the system in question is deterministic.
So why wait? Because this type of social situation is like a
quantum-mechanical system: if you make a measurement, you get a result,
a value. The catch is that in making the measurement, whatever complex
superposition the original state might have started with is collapsed
into an eigenstate (I won't bring up Copenhagen vs. Everett
interpretations here; I don't care about my "alternate selves" except
when I'm occasionally jealous of them.)
By making an observation, I disturb the system. But I want to know the
state of the system without observing it, because I'd rather not
collapse it---I think the superposition is more interesting than any
boring eigenstate (at least in this case.)
Of course, if this were strict QM, I'd be out of luck---I have a single
system, not an ensemble, and I only get one measurement. I lose.
Fortunately, it's not like that, and I may still win. So I wait . . .
for the system to measure me.